File #: 18-138    Version: 1 Name: Public Right-of-Way Vacation - Track "C" of Land's End Subdivision
Type: Resolution Status: Consent Agenda
File created: 3/9/2018 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 5/16/2018 Final action:
Title: Public Right-of-Way Vacation - Tract “C” of Land’s End Subdivision
Sponsors: John Lewis
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Lands End Tract "C" Resolution 18-08, 3. Exhibits 1 and 2 - Half of Tract "C" Vacated to Lot 1, 4. Exhibits 3 and 4 - Half of Tract "C" Vacated to Tract "D", 5. Exhibit 5 & 6 -Final Combined Parcel Legal Maintianing the 10' PUE and 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Title
Public Right-of-Way Vacation - Tract “C” of Land’s End Subdivision

Body
RECOMMENDED ACTION (Motion):
Authorize the Mayor and the City Recorder to execute Resolution No. 18-08, calling for the vacation of a public right-of-way tract, Tax Lot 3-2E-08DA-06000 (no situs address).

BACKGROUND:
On February 14th, 2018, under Planning File No. CP-17-04, the City of Oregon City issued a Type II Master Plan Amendment and Property Line Adjustment Staff Report and Decision for the proposed consolidation of Lot 1, Tract “C”, and Tract “D” of the Land’s End subdivision into one lot. The applicant owns the aforementioned two lots flanking Tract “C”. The Staff Report dictates that the right-of-way vacation process be followed - whereby half of the vacated right-of-way is added to that half’s adjacent property, and the other half to its adjacent property - prior to the lot line adjustment (abandonment) process. Staff concluded that the application for General Development Plan amendment and Lot Line Abandonment met the requirements as described in the Oregon City Municipal Code so long as City Commission approves the vacation of Tract “C”.

In general, a vacation shall be granted only in the event that all of the following conditions exist:

1. There is no present or future public need for the street, alley, or easement.
2. The vacation is in the best public interest.
3. There would be no impacts to adjacent properties.
4. Consent of adjacent property owners when appropriate.

In this case, the City cannot use the right-of-way for its originally-intended purpose - access to Lazy Creek Lane - because the tract is closer than 150 feet from re-aligned, adjacent Molalla Avenue; the vacation is in the public’s best interest; and the vacation has no impact on adjacent properties as acknowledged by their signature. All of these conditions have been met.

Resolution No. 18-08 vacates public right-of-way Tract “C.” Concurrently, Oregon City Public Works requires that a 10-fo...

Click here for full text